Thereโs rarely a week goes by when I donโt see a brief from a client that confidently asks us to โreach everyoneโ.
Donโt get me wrong, weโre a PR agency and itโs our job to earn attention with as many people as possible. Iโve certainly never stood up in a pitch and sold an idea on it reaching not that many people. That would be ridiculous.
But those two words, โreach everyoneโ, are also a bit ridiculous.
Partly because itโs at least 40 years since 30 million-plus people would tune in to watch things like the 1966 World Cup Final (about two-thirds of the UK population back then) or Dirty Den serve Angie with divorce papers in EastEnders. Back then, we could make a decent fist of reaching everyone.
Nowadays (Iโm ignoring the Super Bowl as those numbers were mostly in the US), just 12.8 million tuned in to watch the Kingโs Coronation last year, Happy Valley only managed 11.9 million and Bake Off only managed 9.7 million. Thatโs out of 67.3 million. Barely 15-20 per cent of Britain.
The rise of the streamers and of social media platforms means that the attention of โeveryoneโ weโre often asked to โreachโ is spread so thinly across so many platforms that reaching them all would be a miracle akin to taking a moonshot and actually hitting the moon. From the sun.
Thatโs not to say there arenโt campaigns that get national (even international) attention โ there are plenty of them (rightly lauded at awards). They just never start with the words โwe need to reach everyoneโ.
Because, generally speaking, a brief aimed at everyone will end up appealing to no one. It will get you lowest-common-denominator, slab-a-celeb-on-it ideas that die on the vine even before the day is out. In a nutshell: in trying to reach everyone, we end up appealing to no one.
The best ideas and campaigns generally come from a deep understanding of the behaviour of (and insight into) a specific group of people.
And by specific I most certainly donโt mean โGen Zโ, โYโ, โAlphaโ, 25-34s or whoever the next herd of cattle through marketersโ gate is. I mean Swifties. Or Wrexham fans. Or skateboarding grannies. Or True Crime fans. Or dog-lovers. Or people who donโt like coriander.
The best ideas come from sharp insights and itโs impossible to come up with one of those for 67 million people. Dodgy stereotypes aside, the only thing they have in common is: theyโre British.
But if you whittle that 67 million people down to, say, the 500,000 16-24s who love board games or the seven million who say they love handicrafts, you might have something more to play with.
Itโs our job as agencies to find the โcreative bullseyeโ at the heart of every brief and to root out insights into the few which have the potential to engage the many. And itโs our responsibility to turn these insights into campaigns that reach far and wide.
If we do that, we might not reach everyone but weโll certainly move quite a few hearts and minds.
Adam Mack, Strategy Director at Hope&Glory. This piece originally appeared onย PR Week